The Supreme Court recently condemned the practice of demolishing properties belonging to individuals accused of crimes. The court declared that demolitions cannot occur even if the person is convicted. This decision aims to uphold due process and prevent unjust actions against property owners.
Demolition Guidelines to Be Formulated
The bench, consisting of Justices B.R. Gavai and K.V. Viswanathan, expressed concern over arbitrary demolitions. They emphasized that property demolition must follow proper legal procedures. The court proposed establishing nationwide guidelines to address issues related to such demolitions and ensure fairness.
Clarification on Illegal Structures
While condemning bulldozer justice, the court made it clear that illegal structures blocking public roads are not protected. The Supreme Court reiterated that only properties which are deemed illegal and obstructive can face demolition, provided that due process is followed.
Procedures for Legal Action
Justice Viswanathan questioned the rationale behind demolishing properties of accused individuals. He suggested that there should be a structured process involving notices, opportunities for responses, and legal remedies before any demolition. This approach aims to prevent the misuse of demolition powers.
Past Demolitions Under Scrutiny
Recent years have seen several state governments demolish properties of individuals involved in serious crimes. The Supreme Court’s stance is a reaction to these practices, highlighting the need for adherence to legal procedures and protecting the rights of property owners.
Future Hearing Scheduled
The Supreme Court has scheduled the next hearing on September 17. This will allow further discussion and the formulation of guidelines to regulate demolition practices across the country. The court’s decision marks a significant step towards ensuring justice and legality in property demolitions.