SC Hearing on Kolkata Doctor’s Case Disrupted by CJI’s Outburst

DY Chandrachud reprimands advocate for disruptive behavior during high-profile case

Attention India
3 Min Read

On Monday, September 9, Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud had to rebuke a lawyer for his disruptive behavior during a Supreme Court hearing. The court was addressing the highly sensitive case of the junior doctor who was tragically raped and murdered at Kolkata’s RG Kar Medical College and Hospital on August 9. This case has sparked widespread protests across the country.

Disruptive Behavior In Court

During the proceedings, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the West Bengal government, presented videos and photographs claiming that lawyer Kaustav Bagchi, who is also a BJP leader, was seen throwing stones at a protest related to the case. Bagchi, visibly agitated by these allegations, challenged Sibal’s statements. As tensions rose, CJI Chandrachud intervened, asking Bagchi to lower his voice and not address the court as if it were an audience outside.

CJI’s Stern Warning To Bagchi

Chief Justice Chandrachud told Bagchi, “Can you first lower your pitch? Listen to the Chief Justice, lower your pitch. You are addressing three judges in front of you, not the large audience who is watching these proceedings on the video conferencing platform.” Bagchi promptly apologized for his behavior following the CJI’s reprimand.

Court’s Stance On Protests

The Supreme Court is also dealing with the ongoing doctors’ protests in Kolkata. The court has urged the protesting doctors to resume their duties by 5 PM the following day, assuring them that no punitive action will be taken if they comply. CJI Chandrachud emphasized the importance of continuing their work despite the protests, while also addressing concerns raised by Sibal about potential disciplinary actions.

Challenges In Courtroom Proceedings

As the hearing continued, CJI Chandrachud expressed frustration with multiple lawyers arguing simultaneously, stating, “I am not used to this kind of advocacy where 7-8 people are arguing at the same time.” The court is focused on ensuring that the investigation progresses smoothly, and has requested a fresh report from the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) next Tuesday.

Forensic Examination In Focus

The Solicitor General informed the court about the forensic examination of the victim’s body, mentioning concerns about who collected the samples. The CBI has decided to send the samples to the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) in Delhi for further analysis. The Supreme Court’s handling of the case underscores the gravity of the situation and the importance of maintaining courtroom decorum during such critical proceedings.

Share This Article